Home > Articles > Following Up with Internals

Following Up with Internals

Following Up with Internals

Internal candidates are a critical source of talent for all organizations. Most companies have an internal policy that guarantees qualified internal candidates an interview, but hiring managers don’t always follow up. Maybe they don’t know where to find internal candidates in the system, or perhaps they don’t know what to say to a candidate who doesn’t meet the minimum qualifications.

From the candidates’ perspective, not hearing back can be very disheartening and give the impression that the company doesn’t care. So how can we ensure that internal candidates get the attention they deserve?

We wrestled with a number of approaches before settling on a solution. First, we tried giving hiring managers a report in iCIMS that highlighted their internal candidates. But hiring manager platform utilization always varies. Then we tried having HR conduct follow up with hiring managers, but HR didn’t have the bandwidth to sustain that effort.

Then it occurred to me: why not involve the candidates themselves? The only reason a candidate would hesitate to follow up with a hiring manager is because they don’t know what type of follow-up is appropriate. Should I wait a week? Two weeks? Should I talk to the recruiter? HR? I decided that if I clearly defined what sort of follow-up behavior was appropriate, the candidates could be empowered to conduct some follow-up on their own.

So I created the below email template and started sending it on a weekly basis to anyone who had applied to a job internally over the past seven days.


Subject: Follow-Up on Internal Application

Body:

Hi [Hiring Manager Name],

I’m reaching out to follow up on my internal application for the [Job Title] role. I’m really excited about the opportunity to continue growing within [Company Name], and I’d welcome the chance to discuss how my background could support your team’s goals.

Please let me know if there’s a convenient time to connect, or if there are any additional materials I can provide.

Best,
[Your Name]


The email has two key elements:

  • The line, “Hiring managers have been informed that this type of follow-up from candidates is appropriate and expected,” which reassures the candidate that they are not crossing any lines by sending it.

  • The sample email, which relieves candidates of the burden of crafting a follow-up message.

The first time we did this, we immediately noticed emails coming in from internals who, for one reason or another, had slipped through the cracks. And we were able to connect them with the right people the same day!

This isn’t a cure-all, of course. We also send weekly scheduled reports to senior managers with lists of internal applicants in their divisions so they can follow up with their direct reports in supervision. And we still monitor the progress of internal applicants in HR. But this third piece—empowering candidates to follow up on their own with clear instructions about what is appropriate—just may be the missing ingredient.

How do you use your applicant tracking system to follow up with internals?


Looking for real-world solutions and a community that gets it? Join System Admin Insights (SAI)—a dedicated space for iCIMS system administrators, power users, and TA tech pros. Share ideas, troubleshoot challenges, and stay ahead of the curve with peers who speak your language. Click here to join SAI today.

RELATED POSTS

iCIMS vs HCM applicant tracking system

AI-Powered Sourcing Tools for iCIMS Customers (2025 Comparison)

AI is transforming how recruiters source talent. In this comprehensive comparison, we examine the top AI-powered sourcing tools – from SeekOut and hireEZ to Eightfold, Beamery, Loxo, Gem, and more – with a special focus on iCIMS integration. Discover each vendor’s strengths, ideal use cases, integration depth, and pricing to make an informed decision for your talent team.

iCIMS vs HCM applicant tracking system

Reference Check Software for iCIMS Customers (2025 Comparison)

Mid-market and enterprise TA leaders using iCIMS can benefit from specialized reference check software. This comparison evaluates vendors like SkillSurvey (iCIMS), Xref, Harver (Checkster), Crosschq, Verified First, First Advantage, and Zinc, focusing on iCIMS integration, features, user experience, ideal use cases, and pricing.

The Hidden Power of Workflow Rules in iCIMS

Learn how iCIMS system administrators use workflow rules—like Entrance Criteria, Auto-Launch Actions, and Prompts—to guide recruiters, enforce compliance, and scale smarter without engineering help. This article explores real-world examples and recent platform updates.

System Admin Insights
Subscribe to our newsletter
Get exclusive access to the full learning opportunity