Home > Articles > The Auto-Apply Arms Race and the Mystery of Klaus Grant

The Auto-Apply Arms Race and the Mystery of Klaus Grant

The Auto-Apply Arms Race and the Mystery of Klaus Grant

We had an unusual moment during a recent System Admin Insights meeting.

Someone casually mentioned a strange pattern in their iCIMS ATS: one candidate had submitted 110 applications to their company. Same name, endless spammy email addresses from Gmail and SonaraMail, rinse and repeat.

The name? Klaus Grant.

Cue the collective wait a second moment. Two other members spoke up: “We have that guy too.”

Now, if Klaus Grant is a real person, I hope he’s okay. I even called the number one member had on file (straight to voicemail) and sent a text.

But regardless of whether Klaus is real or a phantom created by resume-blasting software, here’s what’s very real: the tension between software developers building tools for job seekers and software developers building defenses for recruiters is escalating. And the loser, again and again, is the job seeker.

Let me break it down:

  • Tools like LazyApply (aka Sonara—”Cast a wider net — 10x your job applications,” says the website) promise job seekers ease and efficiency. Upload your resume, plug in your preferences, and boom—hundreds of applications go out daily. It feels productive. You see activity. Maybe you even get a few interviews.

  • But what candidates don’t realize is that ATS systems see everything. Including that you applied for 110 roles at the same company, many of which make no sense together. The end result is that recruiters assume all of your applications are spam.

This is the AI arms race in talent acquisition. Tools to game the system vs. tools to protect the system. It’s developer vs. developer, while the candidate experience stays… bad.

If you’re a candidate: I get it. Looking for a job is exhausting, dehumanizing, and opaque. But these spammy AI tools are not helping you. They’re burning bridges before you even have a chance to walk across them.

A more strategic approach—fewer, more tailored applications—is still noticed. It’s increasingly rare now. It stands out. And yes, it’s more effort. But the effort is visible.

The candidates aren’t the enemy here. But they’re caught in a system that treats them like one.

Until we do better: candidates deserve honesty about what’s working—and what isn’t.

RELATED POSTS

iCIMS vs HCM applicant tracking system

Internal Mobility Tools Comparison for iCIMS Customers

A comprehensive, impartial comparison of leading Internal Mobility tools – including Gloat, Fuel50, Eightfold, Phenom (and more) – tailored for iCIMS customers. We examine integration depth with iCIMS, features (AI matching, career pathing, gigs), user experience, global scalability, support, and pricing. Get vendor rankings, key questions to ask, and ideal use-case guidance to inform your talent marketplace decision.

Rethinking Internal Mobility: A Conversation on Elevating the Internal Candidate Experience

Organizations spend millions attracting new talent while their best potential hires sit right under their noses—unseen and unsupported. Internal mobility presents a significant challenge that’s often overlooked despite rising external hiring costs and untapped internal potential. It’s time to recognize internal mobility as the strategic imperative it truly is and give internal candidates the experience they deserve.

System Admin Insights
Subscribe to our newsletter
Get exclusive access to the full learning opportunity